Lyric Stanzas
The metrical families one by one: dactylic, iambic, trochaic, aeolic, ionic, anapaestic, dochmiac and the rest.
Stanzas and epodes · 1 of 5
Asynarteta: Hephaestion's 'unjoined' lines
Hephaestion devotes the fifteenth chapter of his handbook to a class of lines he calls ἀσυνάρτητα (asynartēta), “unjoined” lines. Modern books still often use the term.[1] His definition is short enough to quote:[2]
Γίνεται δὲ καὶ ἀσυνάρτητα, ὁπόταν δύο κῶλα μὴ δυνάμενα ἀλλήλοις συναρτηθῆναι μηδὲ ἕνωσιν ἔχειν ἀντὶ ἑνὸς μόνου παραλαμβάνηται στίχου.
There are also “unjoined” lines, whenever two cola that cannot be fitted to one another or form a unity are taken in place of a single line.
West’s comment is that the ancient metricians rightly saw that the two parts were independent. But they missed the fact that the gap between them is the same kind of gap as separates two periods written on different lines. An asynarteton is simply two periods written on one line, and the brevis in longo or hiatus at the join is ordinary period-end.[1] Archilochus’ epodes can be presented in the same modern way, as small strophes of two or three end-stopped verses. Each verse is marked off by ‖, and the verses are built from iambic cola and the dactylic hemiepes D.[3] Ἐρασμονίδη Χαρίλαε ‖ χρῆμά τοι γελοῖον is such a case. The names Hephaestion attaches to the commonest combinations survive in commentaries, so they are listed here with West’s equivalents.
Archilochus’ asynarteta. Hephaestion says Archilochus was the first to use them,[4] and lists three. (1) An “anapaestic hephthemimer” plus the “trochaic hemiolion called the ithyphallic”. This is his analysis of Ἐρασμονίδη Χαρίλαε χρῆμά τοι γελοῖον, which West writes × D — ‖ ith.[5] A hephthemimer is seven half-feet, here three and a half anapaests. A hemiolion is one and a half metra: the ithyphallic, — ⏑ — ⏑ — —, is a trochaic metron and a half. Hephaestion’s reading and West’s divide the first colon differently:
Ἐρασμονίδη Χαρίλαε
Charilaus son of Erasmon,
Archilochus fr. 168.1, three ways. Grey: Hephaestion’s “anapaestic hephthemimer”, three and a half anapaests, the first replaced by an iamb (Enchiridion 8.7, 15.2). Red: his “prosodiac”, an ionic a maiore (here a second paeon, ⏑ — ⏑ ⏑, in its place) and a choriambic colon (15.3–4). Ochre: West, × D —, with the brevis in longo at the end.
synthetic ∿
(2) A dactylic tetrapody plus the same ithyphallic, οὐκέθ’ ὁμῶς θάλλεις ἁπαλὸν χρόα· κάρφεται γὰρ ἤδη. This is a metre “much used by the more recent poets” (our rendering), with examples from Callimachus and, with a catalectic dactylic colon, Cratinus (4da ¦ ith).[6] (3) A dactylic penthemimer plus an acatalectic iambic dimeter:[7]
ἀλλά μ’ ὁ λυσιμελής
ὠταῖρε, δάμναται πόθος
But limb-loosening desire, my friend, overpowers me.
Archilochus fr. 196, quoted by Hephaestion, Enchiridion 15.9. Hephaestion’s “dactylic penthemimer” is five half-feet of dactyls, two dactyls and a single long: West’s D.
synthetic ∿
Hephaestion adds a long argument that the opening colon of (1) is not really anapaestic but “prosodiac”, made of an ionic and a choriamb. The poets after Archilochus, he argues, avoided the spondees that an anapaestic reading would permit.[8] This is the ancient sense of prosodiac, a term which modern writers use in various senses.[9] It is one reason this site keeps to West’s symbols.
The named dicola. A dicolon is a verse made of two cola. The following table gives Hephaestion’s names, his description, and West’s notation where the glossary supplies one.
| Hephaestion’s name | His description | West |
|---|---|---|
| ἐγκωμιολογικόν (encomiologicum) | dactylic penthemimer + iambic penthemimer; used by Alcaeus and often by Anacreon (15.10) | elegiambus, D × e ×[10] |
| ἰαμβέλεγος (iambelegus) | the reverse; no one known to use it continuously, only here and there, as Pindar (15.11) | × e × D;[11] Lourenço keeps the name for this colon in Euripides[12] |
| Πλατωνικόν (Platōnikon) | “tripenthemimer”: dactylic penthemimers either side of an iambic one; Plato the comic poet (15.12) | — |
| Πινδαρικόν (Pindarikon) | the reverse of the Platonic (15.13) | — |
| ἐλεγεῖον (elegeion) | the dactylic penthemimer taken twice, the second half always seven syllables, the first with its two feet variable (15.14) | the pentameter, D ¦ D ‖, contraction only in the first colon[13] |
| (unnamed) | iambic dimeter + the trochaic hephthemimer “called Euripidean”, as in the Iobacchi ascribed to Archilochus, Δήμητρος ἁγνῆς καὶ Κόρης τὴν πανήγυριν σέβων (15.16); one syllable shorter, it is the “Euripidean fourteen-syllable” (15.17) | 2ia + lk, the same lines ([Archil.] 322–3), where Porson’s Law is broken[1] |
| (unnamed) | trochaic dimeter + iambic hephthemimer, Sappho’s ἔστι μοι καλὰ πάϊς (15.18) | — |
| Κρατίνειον (Kratineion) | a “mixed choriambic” colon + trochaic hephthemimer; made polyschematist by the comic poets (15.21–22) | cratinean, — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏒ — ⏑ — ¦ ○ ○ — × — ⏑ — ‖, ¨gl ¦ gl¨∧ (⏒ as West prints it, a short position that admits a long)[10] |
| (unnamed) | two ithyphallics, Sappho’s δεῦρο δηῦτε Μοῖσαι (15.25) | — |
In West’s column D is — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ ⏑ —, e is — ⏑ —, and × is an anceps, a position that takes a long or a short. So the encomiologicum, D × e ×, runs — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ ⏑ — × — ⏑ — ×.
Hephaestion’s treatment of the elegiac pentameter as an asynarteton (15.14–15) is of interest. It preserves the ancient perception that the pentameter is two independent cola with an obligatory cut. The ἐλεγεῖον, he says, must always be divided at one of the two penthemimers, or it is faulty.[14] West makes the same point in modern terms: two hemiepes always divided by a caesura, with contraction limited to the first.[13] Battezzato writes the couplet hexameter ‖ D | D. Contraction is avoided in the second half of the pentameter.[15]
What to take from this. For a learner the useful residue is small. The names encomiologicum and iambelegus are still used for the D-plus-e pairings that, in a Pindaric strophe, this site simply labels D × e and × e D. “Asynartete” marks a line that an editor should read as two periods. And Archilochus’ epodic combinations were taken over unchanged by Hellenistic poets.[16] Old Comedy went the other way, with West’s “comic dicola”. These are verses compounded from two simple cola and used in stichic series. One of them, × D ⁝ × ⁝ ith ‖ in Wasps 1528–37, joins in a single line the two cola that make up Archilochus’ epodic strophe × D — ‖ ith |||.[17] Where the ancient and modern analyses disagree, as over the “anapaestic” or “prosodiac” opening of Ἐρασμονίδη, this site follows West and says so.
Notes
- ^ a b c West 1987, p. 32.
- ^ Hephaestion, Ench. 15.1.
- ^ Battezzato 2009, pp. 137–138; D’Angour 2022, pp. 135–136.
- ^ Hephaestion, Ench. 15.2.
- ^ Hephaestion, Ench. 15.2; West 1987, p. 32.
- ^ Hephaestion, Ench. 15.8; West 1987, p. 31.
- ^ Hephaestion, Ench. 15.9.
- ^ Hephaestion, Ench. 15.3–6.
- ^ West 1987, p. 89.
- ^ a b West 1987, p. 86.
- ^ West 1987, p. 87.
- ^ Lourenço 2011, pp. 84–85.
- ^ a b West 1987, p. 24.
- ^ Hephaestion, Ench. 15.15.
- ^ Battezzato 2009, p. 138.
- ^ West 1987, p. 76.
- ^ West 1987, pp. 49–50.
Stanzas and epodes · 2 of 5
Stanza forms of Lesbian monody
Monody is song for a single voice. It has its own stanza-forms, simpler and more regular than those of the choral poets. The subject here is the Lesbian poets, Sappho and Alcaeus.
Lesbian strophes. The verses are built from cola whose syllable-count is fixed. This tradition never resolves a long into two shorts, nor contracts two shorts into a long.[1] This fixed count is called isosyllabism, and it is the chief peculiarity of the Aeolic metres.[2] The one freedom is the aeolic base, the first two positions of some cola. In practice the first is more often long than short, and the Lesbian poets seldom make both short.[3] Almost all Lesbian poetry is strophic, with two, three or four verses to the strophe. Where there are three or four, they are not all of one form.[4] Such short strophes were repeated throughout a poem, and often reused from poem to poem.[5] West’s example is Sappho fr. 94.6–8, where the third verse amplifies the first two. He calls this pattern aaA. The first two verses are glyconics, gl, × × — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ —; the third, glᵈ, is a glyconic expanded by one dactyl:[3]
6 τὰν δ’ ἔγω τάδ’ ἀμειβόμαν
7 χαίροισ’ ἔρχεο κἄμεθεν
8 μέμναισ’, οἶσθα γὰρ ὤς ⟨σ⟩ε πεδήπομεν
And I answered her: Go, and be glad, and keep me in mind; you know how we looked after you.
Sappho fr. 94.6–8. Red: the aeolic base, — ⏑ in 6, — — in 7 and 8. Lines 6 and 7 are glyconics (a, a); line 8 is one dactyl longer (A). Translation ours.
synthetic ∿
The base of the first glyconic is — ⏑, and of the others — —. χαίροισ’ ἔρχεο is run together by elision. The same analysis can be written glyc ‖ glyc ‖ glyc da |||.[6]
Sapphic and Alcaic. The two commonest strophe-forms have the same aaA pattern:[4]
| Sapphic | Alcaic | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | — ⏑ — × — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ — — ‖ (∧ia hag) | × — ⏑ ⁝ — × ⁝ — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ — ‖ (pe ⁝ dod) |
| 2 | — ⏑ — × — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ — — ‖ (∧ia hag) | × — ⏑ ⁝ — × ⁝ — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ — ‖ (pe ⁝ dod) |
| 3 | — ⏑ — × — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ ⁝ — × ⁝ — ⏑ ⏑ — — ||| | × — ⏑ ⁝ — × — ⏑ — × ⁝ — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ — — ||| |
(⁝ reproduces West’s dotted bars; the small arcs he prints over some positions of the third periods are not reproduced.) West allows that the third Sapphic period could be labelled ∧ia hag ⁝ ad. But he warns that the label hides what matters: the period is the first two stretched out. For the third Alcaic period he gives no label at all, only the scheme, presented as the Alcaic parallel.[4] These strophe-forms were used in many different poems, and the forms were probably bound to particular melodies.
West’s labels name the cola. ∧ia is an iambic metron without its first position, — ⏑ —; hag, the hagesichorean, is × — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ — —; pe, the penthemimer, is × — ⏑ — ×; dod, the dodrans, is — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ —; and ad, the adonean, is — ⏑ ⏑ — —.[7]
Ancient copies split the third period of each over two written lines, at a frequent caesura. In the Sapphic this is after position 11, and in the Alcaic after position 9. Hence Horace treats them as four-line strophes, and editions still usually print them so.[8] D’Angour presents them in that form, AAAB for the Sapphic and AABC for the Alcaic. He adds that the last two lines are joined so tightly that they run as one rhythmic unit, in synapheia.[9] The four-line layout goes back to Hellenistic and imperial practice, and there is no metrical pause between the third and fourth lines.[10] Here is a Sapphic strophe, the first of Sappho’s hymn to Aphrodite, set out by West’s cola:
1 Ποικιλόθρον’ ἀθανάτ’ Ἀφρόδιτα
2 παῖ Δίος δολόπλοκε, λίσσομαί σε
3 μή μ’ ἄσαισι μηδ’ ὀνίαισι δάμνα
4 πότνια, θῦμον
Immortal Aphrodite of the intricate throne, child of Zeus who plaits deceits, I pray you: do not with nausea and with sorrows break, Lady, my heart,
Sappho fr. 1.1–4, a Sapphic strophe. Lines 3 and 4 together are the third period, ∧ia hag ⁝ ad, written over two lines.
synthetic ∿
And an Alcaic strophe by Alcaeus:
5 κάββαλλε τὸν χείμων’, ἐπὶ μὲν τίθεις
6 πῦρ, ἐν δὲ κέρναις οἶνον ἀφειδέως
7 μέλιχρον, αὐτὰρ ἀμφὶ κόρσαι
8 μάλθακον ἀμφι[βάλων] γνόφαλλον
Throw the storm down: heap up the fire, and mix the wine, not sparing it, sweet as honey, and at your temples wrap a soft woollen pad.
Alcaeus fr. 338.5–8, an Alcaic strophe; square brackets mark letters restored. Lines 7 and 8 together are the third period, written over two lines.
synthetic ∿
A strophe of one period. Now and then a whole strophe is a single compound period, as in Sappho fr. 96.12–14.[11] This strophe reads as one verse, with all its lines in synapheia:[6]
12 ἀ δ’ ⟨ἐ⟩έρσα κάλα κέχυται, τεθά-
13 λαισι δὲ βρόδα κἄπαλ’ ἄν-
14 θρυσκα καὶ μελίλωτος ἀνθεμώδης
Fair dew has fallen all around; roses are thriving, and soft chervil, and melilot full of flowers.
Sappho fr. 96.12–14: one period over three written lines. Words run over the line-ends, τεθά|λαισι (tethalaisi), ἄν|θρυσκα (anthryska). Red: δὲ (de), long before βρ (br), which West divides between the syllables. Translation ours.
synthetic ∿
Words run over the line-ends (τεθά|λαισι, ἄν|θρυσκα), so there is no period-end until the close. West marks the α of ἐέρσᾱ, κάλᾱ and τεθᾱ́- long (the Lesbian long ᾱ). So the base of the first glyconic is — ⏑ (σᾱ κά-). And he divides δὲ β|ρόδα, so δέ is long before βρ.[11]
Outside the strophe. Some of Sappho’s fragments are in hexameters on the Ionian model. They have features alien to normal Lesbian verse: contraction, correption and a short syllable before stop + liquid (fr. 105). One aeolic poem, fr. 44, is a narrative with a heroic setting. It admits the same abnormalities except contraction. Its metre is gl²ᵈ used stichically, line after line.[11]

Notes
- ^ West 1987, p. 32.
- ^ Battezzato 2021, p. 121; cf. Battezzato 2009, p. 134.
- ^ a b West 1987, p. 33.
- ^ a b c West 1987, p. 34.
- ^ Battezzato 2009, p. 132.
- ^ a b Battezzato 2021, p. 128.
- ^ West 1987, pp. 31, 33.
- ^ West 1987, p. 35 with n. 1.
- ^ D’Angour 2022, ch. 9, §’Archaic Lyric Meters’.
- ^ Battezzato 2021, p. 127.
- ^ a b c West 1987, p. 35.
Stanzas and epodes · 3 of 5
Triadic structure
Choral lyric of the Dorian tradition leans towards longer periods and longer, more intricate strophes, and treats the strophe itself differently. The Ionian and Lesbian strophe-forms were, at least some of the time, stock patterns used in more than one poem. A Dorian strophe, as far as we can tell, was devised afresh for each song. It was usually made out of familiar cola, but was free to introduce new ones.[1] Archilochus, Sappho and Alcaeus often reused one strophe-type in different poems. Stesichorus, Simonides, Pindar and Bacchylides built more complex structures, each used in one poem only.[2]
The triad. The enlargement of structure becomes still more striking with Stesichorus’ and Ibycus’ use of the triadic system. Two responding strophes, strophe and antistrophe, are followed by a third of different metrical form, the epode (ἡ ἐπῳδός, hē epōidos; sc. στροφή, strophē). The poet could then repeat the whole set as often as he liked.[3] Stesichorus and Ibycus (and, in an early form, Alcman) compose their choral odes in this AAB pattern.[4] The pattern is thus AAB AAB AAB..., in contrast to the AAAA of monostrophic song and the AA BB CC of drama.[5] The triad is the usual form in Simonides, Bacchylides and Pindar. One triad can make a whole poem. Pindar frequently runs to five, and goes beyond that only in the vast Pythian 4, with thirteen. Bacchylides reaches eight at least.[6] Pindar’s range runs from a single triad (Pythian 7) to the thirteen of Pythian 4, and the typical ode has about four.[7]
What the early strophes look like. A strophe of Alcman’s Louvre Partheneion (PMG 1.36–49) has fourteen verses. There are lekythia and hagesichoreans in alternation (lk ‖ hag ‖ four times), two trochaic trimeters, two trochaic dimeters, and a dactylic tetrameter joined to a dactylically expanded aristophanean (4da | arᵈ |||). Period-end is established by brevis in longo (36) or hiatus (38, 39, 45). Brevis in longo is a short syllable in a long position at the end of a period; hiatus is a vowel left unelided before a vowel.[8] Once established in one strophe, it must be assumed at the corresponding places in all the others, and conversely.[9]
Stesichorus’ “Thebaid” shows a true triad. West prints its strophe/antistrophe, built of D-cola, links, penthemimers and a closing ia pe. He prints its epode too, of D-cola, penthemimers and a trochaic dimeter with the heavy close — — — ⏑ — —.[10] The strophe of the Geryoneis, by contrast, is wholly dactylic, ⏔ 3da∧ ‖ ⏔ 7da∧ ‖ ⏔ 5da∧ ‖ ⏔ 14da∧∧ |||. The blunt close of the strophe is set against the pendant endings before it.[11] A blunt close ends on a long after a short, ⏑ —; a pendant close ends on an extra syllable after the last long, — ×.[12] Ibycus PMG 286.1–6 appears to be a whole strophe. It has three ibyceans (dodᵈ, — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ —), each a period. Then comes a fourth period of three dactylic tetrameters and an arᵈ, which enlarges the pattern of the first three and ends pendant where they end blunt.[13]
| Poem | Unit West analyses | Character | West |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alcman, Partheneion 1.36–49 | strophe of 14 verses | iambo-trochaic, aeolic and dactylic cola | pp. 36–37 |
| Stesichorus, “Thebaid” | strophe, antistrophe, epode | dactylic cola with iambo-trochaic elements at period-ends | p. 37 |
| Stesichorus, Geryoneis | strophe | wholly dactylic, uniform rhythm | pp. 37–38 |
| Ibycus 286.1–6 | apparently a complete strophe | four periods, aeolic and dactylic, the last expanded | pp. 38–39 |
| Pindar, Pythian 12 | strophe, used four times | eight periods of D/e | p. 43 |
| Pindar, Nemean 4 | first strophe | eight aeolic periods, analysable at sight | p. 45 |
| Pindar, Olympian 2 | lines 1–4 | iambic, syncopated and unsyncopated metra | p. 46 |
| Pindar, Pythian 4 | the whole ode | thirteen triads | p. 42 |
| Bacchylides 17 | the scheme | iambic; syncopated responding with unsyncopated | pp. 46–47 |
Variety within the triad. The three metrical categories of the classical choral poets, dactylo-epitrite, aeolic and iambic, each produce triads of a different texture.[14] Pindar’s odes fall into the same three classes, with some overlap.[7] D/e strophes can be analysed into D (— ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ ⏑ —) and e (— ⏑ —) with little trouble, as Pythian 12 shows. The very simplest aeolic poems can be analysed at sight, like the first strophe of Nemean 4.[15]
Most aeolic strophes are harder. The opening is usually easy to analyse. But once the poet has set out an opening motif, he tends to vary and elaborate it through the rest of the strophe or triad. This produces sequences which look bewildering in isolation, but are easily derived from what has gone before. Where a colon comes from matters more than what it is called.[16] West’s example is lines 3–5 of the strophe of Nemean 6. There a resolved glyconic is followed by a colon that replaces its resolutions by — ⏑ and ⏑ —. Then comes a lekythion produced from the glyconic by reducing its two middle shorts to a single anceps, and then a further variation on gl.[16] Snell, who first understood the principle, sets out Pindar’s schemes with related sequences in vertical alignment, and with bracketed symbols such as (gl) for mutant forms.[17]
The iambic odes, Simonides PMG 541, Olympian 2, Pindar fr. 75 and Bacchylides 17, are almost wholly built of syncopated and unsyncopated iambic metra, that is, metra with and without a suppressed position. They have occasional dochmiac units and, at period-end, sometimes a trochaic metron.[17] Maehler reads Bacchylides 17 as cretic instead (disputed).
Reading a triad. Because the triad is repeated, evidence for period-end anywhere in one strophe or epode is valid for the corresponding place in every other.[9] In tragedy, by contrast, no strophe is heard more than twice, and the signs of period-end are only occasional.[18] The same holds for the details of a line. Here is the first line of three stanzas of Bacchylides 3, from three different triads, each keeping the same resolution at the same place:
3.1, str. 1 ἀριστοκάρπου Σικελίας κρέουσαν
The queen of Sicily, land of the best harvests,
3.19, ant. 2 πάροιθε ναοῦ, τόθι μέγιστον ἄλσος
before the temple, where the mightiest precinct
3.29, str. 3 φύλαξ’ Ἀπόλλων. ὁ δ’ ἐς ἄελπτον ἆμαρ
kept safe. And he, reaching the day he never looked for,
Bacchylides 3.1, 3.19 and 3.29: the first line of the strophe in the first triad, of the antistrophe in the second and of the strophe in the third, each an iambic trimeter catalectic. Red: the same long resolved into two shorts in all three. In 3.29 some letters are restored.
synthetic ∿

Notes
- ^ West 1987, pp. 35–36.
- ^ Battezzato 2009, p. 132.
- ^ West 1987, p. 36.
- ^ Battezzato 2009, p. 132; Krummen 2009, p. 189.
- ^ West 1987, p. 50.
- ^ West 1987, p. 42.
- ^ a b Brown 2022, p. 337.
- ^ West 1987, pp. 4, 15.
- ^ a b West 1987, pp. 36–37.
- ^ West 1987, p. 37.
- ^ West 1987, p. 38.
- ^ West 1987, p. 6.
- ^ West 1987, pp. 38–39.
- ^ West 1987, p. 43.
- ^ West 1987, pp. 43, 45.
- ^ a b West 1987, p. 45.
- ^ a b West 1987, p. 46.
- ^ West 1987, pp. 51–52; Battezzato 2005, p. 151.
Stanzas and epodes · 4 of 5
Worked example: a whole triad, Bacchylides 2
The plainest way to see what a triad is, is to scan a whole one. Bacchylides’ second ode, for Argeius of Ceos, is a complete poem in a single triad of fourteen short lines. It has a strophe, an antistrophe in the same metre, and an epode in a different one.[1] A poem may consist of one triad, while Bacchylides elsewhere runs to at least eight.[2] The ode is the smaller of two Bacchylides wrote for the same Isthmian victory. The larger, Ode 1, is in dactylo-epitrite. This one is in what Hendry calls iambic metre with priapean clausulae.[3]

Strophe (1–5)
1 ἄ[ϊξεν ἁ] σεμνοδότειρα Φήμα
2 ἐς Κέον ἱεράν, χαριτώ-
3 νυμον φέρουσʼ ἀγγελίαν
4 ὅτι μ[άχ]ας θρασύχειρος Ἀρ-
5 γεῖος ἄρατο νίκαν
Fame, bestower of honour, has rushed to sacred Ceos, carrying news that bears a gracious name: that in the contest of daring fists Argeius has carried off the victory.
Bacchylides 2.1–5, the strophe; square brackets mark letters restored. Red, in 2: ἱε- (hie-) sung as one syllable; in 4: the glyconic’s base with its first position resolved, three shorts.
synthetic ∿
Epode (11–14)
11 καλεῖ δὲ Μοῦσʼ αὐθιγενὴς
12 γλυκεῖαν αὐλῶν καναχάν
13 γεραίρουσʼ ἐπινικίοις
14 Πανθείδα φίλον υἱόν
And the Muse born here summons the pipes’ sweet clangour, to celebrate with songs of victory Pantheides’ beloved son.
Bacchylides 2.11–14, the epode. Red: the glyconic’s base, now unresolved, ⏑ —. Lines 13–14, glyconic and pherecratean, are the priapean that closes both stanzas.
synthetic ∿
The labels are Maehler’s, from the scheme Hendry reproduces (Hendry 1994, part 1).
Step by step
1. Syllables and quantities. Carry consonants over to the next vowel, and count closed syllables long.[4] ἄϊξεν has ϊ long before ξ. σεμ- is closed. φέρουσ’ ἀγ-γε- gives a long σἀγ-. The Doric colouring of Bacchylides is chiefly a long α where Ionic has η, though the scribes often write η instead, as in φήμα.[5] Here the article ἁ, the final -α of Φήμα, νίκᾱν and Πανθείδᾱ are all long. In 4 ὅτι μά- is three shorts. This is the base of the glyconic with its first position resolved, the resolved form ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ that West describes as normal for a two-position base in tragic aeolic.[6] ἱεράν (hieran) in 2 must be sung as two syllables (ἱε- by synizesis, two vowels sung as one syllable) if it is to answer 7 exactly, as Maehler assumes. Hendry notes that the word has three syllables elsewhere in Bacchylides. One then has to choose between synizesis and an imperfect responsion.[7]
2. The cola. There are three kinds, all in Maehler’s list. They are the iambic metron ⏑ — ⏑ — and the baccheus ⏑ — —, the choriamb — ⏑ ⏑ —, and two aeolic cola, the glyconic and the pherecratean.[8] A glyconic followed by a pherecratean is the priapean.[9] In both strophe and epode it closes the stanza: the “priapean clausula” of Hendry’s description.
3. Periods. Maehler marks only one period-end inside the strophe, after the first line (Hendry 1994, part 1). The text shows why. After 1 there is hiatus, Φήμα | ἐς, and in the antistrophe hiatus again at the same place, κλεεννῷ | αὐχένι. Hiatus is one of the signs of period-end, and what one strophe shows holds for the corresponding place in the others.[10] Elsewhere words run across the line-ends, in one stanza or the other, at every junction from 2 to 5: χαριτώ-|νυμον, νᾶ-|σον, Ἀρ-|γεῖος and ἑβδομή-|κοντα. A period cannot end inside a word.[11] So lines 2–5 are a single period, written on four lines. Within the verse, as in Homer, a lost digamma is assumed where it removes a hiatus. Hiatus is admitted only sometimes, before names.[12] Jebb’s text prints a digamma in ϝισθμοῦ (7), so that αὐχένι does not stand in hiatus. Maehler does not discuss this word.
Strophe, antistrophe, epode
| Line | Strophe (1–5) | Antistrophe (6–10) | Epode (11–14) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ⏑ — ⏑ — — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ — — ‖ | ⏑ — ⏑ — — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ — — ‖ | ⏑ — ⏑ — — ⏑ ⏑ — |
| 2 | — ⏑ ⏑ — — ⏑ ⏑ — | — ⏑ ⏑ — — ⏑ ⏑ — | ⏑ — ⏑ — — ⏑ ⏑ — |
| 3 | ⏑ — ⏑ — — ⏑ ⏑ — | ⏑ — ⏑ — — ⏑ ⏑ — | ⏑ — — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ — |
| 4 | ⏖ ⏑ — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ — | ⏖ ⏑ — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ — | — — — ⏑ ⏑ — — ||| |
| 5 | — ⏑ — ⏑ ⏑ — — ||| | — ⏑ — ⏑ ⏑ — — ||| |
The antistrophe repeats the strophe syllable for syllable, even the resolved base of 4 (σον ἐπε-, 9). The epode is a different stanza built from the same material. It drops the opening ia cho ba ‖ and the double choriamb, keeps ia cho twice, and ends with the same priapean. Its glyconic now has an unresolved base ⏑ —. This is West’s point about the choral poets. The poet sets out an opening motif and then varies it through the strophe or triad, so that where a colon comes from matters more than its name.[13]
What makes this a triad
The pattern is AAB: two stanzas that answer each other exactly, then a third that answers neither but is made of their cola. In a longer ode the whole set would then repeat.[1] Hendry reads the same syllables differently. He hears single iambs and trochees in simple triple time, with a rest at each period-end, the rhythm shifting only in the last four feet, under the victor’s patronymic Πανθείδα φίλον υἱόν (Hendry 1994, part 1). The two analyses describe the same scansion. They differ in what the listener is supposed to hear.
Notes
Stanzas and epodes · 5 of 5
Anacreon's stanzas
Anacreon of Teos was an Ionian. But his rhythms range far more widely than anything we have from the Ionian poets before him, with aeolic cola and ionics to the fore.[1] His surviving lyric is composed mainly in anacreontic-ionic, iambo-trochaic and aeolo-choriambic metre.[2] His stanzas are short, like the Lesbians’, and built from a few cola.
Aeolic stanzas. PMG 358.1–4 is three glyconics and a pherecratean (so also Cingano 2022, p. 300, and Budelmann 2009, p. 231, who notes that Anacreon’s strophes are only four lines long).[1] The Greek follows Smyth’s text, with iota adscript:
1 σφαίρηι δηὖτέ με πορφυρῆι
2 βάλλων χρυσοκόμης Ἔρως
3 νήνι ποικιλοσαμβάλωι
4 συμπαίζειν προκαλεῖται
Once again golden-haired Eros, striking me with a purple ball, challenges me to play with a girl in fancy sandals.
Anacreon, PMG 358.1–4: Smyth 1900 pp. 46–47, public domain. Red: the aeolic base, long long in every line.
synthetic ∿
Word-division sets the four cola clearly apart, yet they run on in synapheia. And the freedom of the aeolic base is limited. At least one of its two syllables must be long, and normally both are, as in every line of this stanza.[1] West marks the ι of νήνῑ long.
The anaclastic glyconic ¨gl, — ⏑ ⏑ — × — ⏑ —, is used with its catalectic, the aristophanean (PMG 385–6), and with the ithyphallic (387). With choriambic expansion it gives iambo-choriambic verses. Used interchangeably and joined by an iambic dimeter, these form the strophe of 388. Where the plain glyconic opens with its two-position base, × × — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ —, the anaclastic glyconic opens with the choriamb, — ⏑ ⏑ — × — ⏑ —. In 388.8 it is joined to an iambic dimeter:
πολλὰ δὲ νῶτα σκυτίνῃ μάστιγι θωμιχθείς, κόμην
many times with his back lashed by a whip of hide, and with his hair
Anacreon, PMG 388.8: Greek from Bergk 1882 III p. 262, including νῶτα in the apparatus; an anaclastic glyconic joined to an iambic dimeter. Red: -τα (-ta), the anceps in the middle of the anaclastic glyconic, here long.
synthetic ∿
In 378 the catalectic form appears with its initial position resolved (⏑ ⏑ ⏑ — …), and the resolution continues through the whole song as a deliberate ornament. With one doubtful case in Ibycus, this is the first known resolution in the sequence — ⏑ ⏑.[3]
Ionics. Anacreon’s ionics are for the most part anaclastic, the anacreontic ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ — ⏑ — — (2io÷), which usually comes in pairs bound by synapheia, as in PMG 395.1–6:[4]
1–2 πολιοὶ μὲν ἧμιν ἤδη κρόταφοι, κάρη τε λευκόν
3–4 χαρίεσσα δ’ οὐκέτ’ ἥβη πάρα, γηραλέοι δ’ ὀδόντες
5–6 γλυκεροῦ δ’ οὐκέτι πολλὸς βιότου χρόνος λέλειπται
My temples are already grey and my head is white; graceful youth is here no longer, and my teeth are old; of sweet life not much time is left.
Anacreon, PMG 395.1–6: Smyth 1900 p. 49, public domain. Red, in 3–4: -λέοι (-leoi), one syllable by synecphonesis; in 5–6: the straight ionic dimeter in the penultimate colon.
synthetic ∿
West marks γηραλέοι with -έοι as one syllable (synecphonesis). The straight ionic dimeter in the penultimate colon, ⏑ ⏑ — — ⏑ ⏑ — —, makes the shape of the strophe clearer. The second strophe of the song repeats the pattern exactly.[4] This is a characteristic metrical habit of Anacreon’s: a run of anacreontics with a plain ionic dimeter as its last line but one.[5] Anacreon also has ionic trimeters, already used by Sappho, and a lengthened variant.[4]
Dovetailing. A curious relationship between ionic and aeolic appears in PMG 346 fr. 1. Divided as two anaclastic glyconics and a choriambically expanded aristophanean (¨gl ¨gl arᶜ), it would be straightforward aeolic. In fact the cola are dovetailed. Word-end comes systematically one position later than expected, so that the whole reads as ionic. Some of the Athenian skolia dovetail too, and many of them shared their tunes. Skolia 898–901 share one two-verse form. A dozen others share one four-verse form, whose third verse fits none of the standard names.[6]
The Anacreontea. Much later the Carmina Anacreontea, composed between the late Hellenistic age and the fifth century AD, kept short stanzas alive. Many use the hemiambic, basically a catalectic iambic dimeter × — ⏑ — ⏑ — — ‖, sometimes grouped in four-line stanzas.[7] Others use the anacreontic itself, a few of them in stanzas of three, four or five lines.[8] Most of their metres are related to these two ‘Anacreontic’ verses, the catalectic iambic dimeter and the anaclastic ionic dimeter.[9] Anacreon himself has the first of them, in a couplet Hephaestion quotes:
ὁ μὲν θέλων μάχεσθαι
πάρεστι γάρ, μαχέσθω
Whoever wishes to fight, let him fight; it is open to him.
Anacreon, quoted by Hephaestion: two catalectic iambic dimeters, the shape of the hemiambic.
synthetic ∿

